Werewolf - Road To Qatar - Day 3

Norn is acting like someone who wrote one of those 3 messages and is trying to drive home a specific agenda. I realise he might feel defensive as he's been accused by Mike, but seriously, I don't feel like he's behaving in the best interests of the village so far today at all.

 

You're not evil. You're good. But you're wrong.

 

For me, it's between SLB and Sinatra today.

The latter's explanation and lack thereof at a time when he was being questioned from a number of angles prior to the voting deadline really didn't cut the mustard.

 

You barely read them but had time to do this analysis?

 

It was two angles to be fair, I voted and left as I was busy. It would've been much easier to vote Cth and blend in with the crowd, if I was a wolf why would I make myself stand out? Given you just said it would take a brave Alpha to name an Evil Day 1, it would take an even stupider wolf to make themselves stand out in such a way, don't make it personal I'm sorry that you give me wolfie vibes okay.

 

This bloody game it's about as understandable as a clue on 321.

Moog has been named as good in all 3 messages
We just need to agree if message 1 was the seer or the wolf. The format of the message with the code in, would suggest that the 1st is from the wolf - doesn't it ?

 

For the same reason I think Moog is good and that you are evil. Let's call it intuition.

 

Done

 

The fact that message 3 has actually divulged the science behind the code (which does check out) means i'm inclined to believe message 2 is from the author which didn't get a message on day 1.

For me, SLB being named good in day 3 message 2 only goes to heighten my suspicions of him even more after the whole @ Harrow shenanigans on day 1. It's seemingly less and less of a coincidence every day.

Not trying to lead a witch hunt, but it's the best i've got at the moment.

For what it's worth, I concur a lot with mike's content, but I don't think norn is evil.

 

I'm voting Ashdon, get it out the way early so Otter can enjoy his night as he deserves. My reasons below.

- General instinct wolf like play
- Today's kills were the two people who asked me to justify my vote yesterday, I think that was a smart ploy to try direct blame my way.
- Ashdon is the only one to have picked up on it in today's posts, trying to deflect.
- Name as Good on Day 1 in a reverse ploy to hide behind the "that would be too brave" theory.

 

Calling this very obvious traitor play.

 

Oh for **** sake, this is the most unwolfy like post you do after I detail my reasons for voting you.

Now I'm confused.

 

I have to say, I'm glad they explained it. I would never ever have worked that out. I take it the text is possibly another clue.

 

Hang on now I might useless but I'm also good. Stick that in your fur windpipe wolfie!

 

So we can probably discount Message 2 today and by the fact that all 3 today name me as good, Message 2 from yesterday.

Then it's simply a matter of determining whether the Southgate messages are the Seer or not. A wolf is just as capable of creating a code.

 

Well one of them on the face of it looks good. Pointing fingers again...

 

Also, trying to help limit the endless possibilities in this game.

If Opti was evil, would the Guardian have seen anything when protecting him? Essentially what I'm asking is, is there anything from that which gives us clarity on at least one player's position?

 

Thanks for clarifying.

 

Feels harsh.

On the topic, nothing jumped out at me that would make me think Opti was in the firing line, so it really is outstanding play by the Guardian. I feel like the wolf probably thought they would have an easy kill there last night to cull the numbers.

 

Even if so. You're the only named evil, the only way of proving which message is which and you could prove the innocence of players, including Ashdon, who people have been accusing.

Not killing you and picking out a random is completely non-sensical as we have nothing else to go on, unless you have any other ideas?

 

For example, if we knew something is normally hinted in messages if Guardian protects an evil at least we’d know Opti is confirmed Good.

As it is, he’s still a suspect and in Werewolf anything goes, his surgery might even be a play.

 

Who is Sinatra defending? I'd be interested in seeing who has been accused just before his random and baseless posts which seem determined to change the subject

 

Or to put it another way. To stop the discussion around NI, he's going to pluck a completely random question out of the air.

There were a billion different questions out there, and now there are a billion minus one.

It is true that the guardians protection says nothing about whether they are good or evil (although of course it suggests he seems good to the guardian).

But I really doubt Opti would lay the groundwork on day 1 for being silent on day 3, to avoid suspicion. It would be a lot of effort for very little reward.

 

I'm a little with Nornironhorn here.

This just seems so laid back. Would the Seer really let a viewed evil go by with out making a bigger things of it ? Especially after a random villager was lynched ?

The other part - After my pick tomorrow there won't be any evil left - I think most of us assume there are two wolves and a traitor out there. In which case finding another + Nornironhorn ( if he is evil ) still leaves one short. The math don't add up.

I really don't think Nornironhorn is evil, his done nothing to suggest that he is, his been named as good in a message that we generally think is from the seer, but... unfortunately he is the only named evil from the messages we feel are from the wolf / seer.

 

I can confirm his surgery isn't a play, just for the record. His silence is valid at the moment.

But agreed, he could be evil as far as i'm concerned despite the Guardian's protection from a wolf kill.

 

I genuinely can't work any of this out. Had a go earlier presuming that we wouldn't get a third message which turned out to be complete waste of my time as the third message then arrived four minutes later.