Philip Zinckernagel

Discussion in 'Former Players Archive' started by Hogg-DEENEY!!!, Jan 26, 2021.

  1. Hogg-DEENEY!!!

    Hogg-DEENEY!!! Squad Player

    I don't think Zinck is Premier League quality, but £5m is certainly not unheard of for a good Championship player even if he isn't exactly young (especially if the team signing him have Premier League money). On reflection agreed that £10m is ambitious, but £5m seems fair to me
     
  2. WatfordTalk

    WatfordTalk First Team

    My god, not this again! Impact on the club, man!

    So as not to get down a boring discussion rabbit hole again: I don't think he's ****, I think he's a mostly average Championship player who has shown signs this season that he could be a decent championship player. You think he's better than that. And that's fine.
     
  3. WatfordTalk

    WatfordTalk First Team

    You're taking a post by RC at face value?
     
  4. Carpster

    Carpster Squad Player

    Garner is only one behind him on goals and assists this season :eek:
     
  5. Chumlax

    Chumlax Squad Player

    He is their set piece taker though, is he not? (No, I have not in any way checked whether that argument is supported by the nature of his goals and/or assists...:oops:)
     
    lowerrous likes this.
  6. miked2006

    miked2006 Premiership Prediction League Proprietor

    Garner is a quality player who will deservedly be at a better club than us next season.
     
  7. Knight GT

    Knight GT Predictor extraordinaire 2013/14

    He looked absolutely shattered just before he came off last night. The fact he gets subbed pretty much every game after 60-70 mins is a big concern I would think
     
  8. WatfordTalk

    WatfordTalk First Team

    Kiko Femenia:

    26 apps
    Defender in the Premier League
    Plays for the 2nd worst team in the league with 33 goals all season
    5 assists

    PZ:

    44 apps
    Attacker in the Championship
    Plays for the 4th best team in the league with 73 goals all season
    7 assists

    Get Kiko in that number 10 role and he'll tear the championship a new arshhole
     
    AndrewH63 and lutonh8a like this.
  9. Burnsy

    Burnsy First Team

    No, no desire to go down old roads!

    I’m just suggesting that by giving him 3/10 last season when he got the most amount of team assists in a team that came 2nd and in just half the time of his teammates…and then consistently calling him ‘bang average’ this season, despite being a regular in a team that finished 4th….that it’s easy to see why some would link you to any suggestions that he’s ‘sh*t’ or something close to.
     
  10. Burnsy

    Burnsy First Team

    As stated, plenty of good footballers all over the world come off regularly on 60-70 mins. In an age of 9 subs and 5 able to be used, I doubt it’s much of a concern at all. Or certainly not a huge one as people think. The fact he is still regularly started in the next game suggests as much.
     
    PowerJugs and Hogg-DEENEY!!! like this.
  11. WatfordTalk

    WatfordTalk First Team

    This is where the confusion is. The 3/10 wasn't a mark on his performance last season. It was a judgement on his overall impact on the club, when compared to every other player ever signed by Gino. To get a 3 after just 9 starts isn't bad going, imo.

    If I was giving him a mark purely on his performance after he arrived it January it would be a 5 or a 6.

    I've never said he's ****, because I don't think he is.
     
    Burnsy likes this.
  12. Burnsy

    Burnsy First Team

    That’s quite confusing - how can he be marked down against time he wasn’t even at the club? I understand it’s your scoring system but it’s an odd way to score it.

    I’d have thought every player starts on 6 (average) and the score you give them goes up or down? I’ve never seen a scoring system that starts on 0 and also takes consideration to the time before they even played at the club!

    Anyway. I guess the confusion is just the angle we are both coming from! But when you say ‘no one has said he’s **** or anywhere near it’, you can see why some might attach you to that kind of comment!
     
  13. WatfordTalk

    WatfordTalk First Team

    He's not being marked down for time he wasn't at the club?

    By that way of working I'd be giving Obbi Oulare and Samba Diakite 6/10? Player joins and starts as a zero as they've made zero positive impact on the club. Ighalo would be a zero when he first signed up, but ended up with a 9/10 for playing a huge part in promotion and a successful PL season.

    Not sure why I'd be attached to that sort of comment as I've never said anything close to it, and have been pretty consistent in the view that (imo) he's an average Championship player.
     
  14. Burnsy

    Burnsy First Team

    Well no, they would start on 6 and then quickly decline for doing the square root of nothing in their tiny amount of appearances. So very low scores or even those of zero are fair enough.

    But Zinckernagel starts on a 6 and then gets the most amount of team assists in half a season, at the very least he stays on a 6 (and subjectively, some would score higher - but I think the vast majority would say 6 is ‘average’). Scoring a 3 seems very unfair to be honest and that’s why, when you have repeatedly said he’s average this season too, I would probably label you as someone who comes across as thinking he’s somewhere ‘near sh*t’ when I read it.

    You’re saying his impact as a Watford player has been 3/10 - for someone with good numbers last season, okay numbers this season, was bought for free and would turn a nice profit if sold, and has played regularly for 2 teams at the top end of the division he’s played in - I’m really confused how the score is so low but you’re not calling him close to ****!

    ( I don’t mean any of this personally for the record!)
     
  15. simpleMASH

    simpleMASH Reservist

    I agree with your scoring if you're rating their ability. But if you're scoring their contribution to the club then it HAS to start at 0 because they haven't contributed anything yet?

    If we signed Messi and then he realised he's not gone that far downhill yet and got a loan elsewhere a week later, he'd get a 0 in WT's ratings. Not because he's s*** (I imagine he'd be due at least a 7 in 'ability'!) but because he wouldn't have had any impact for the club on the pitch, which is what's being assessed.
     
    WatfordTalk likes this.
  16. WatfordTalk

    WatfordTalk First Team

    So if a player joins, gets injured and doesn't make an appearance, would they score a 6?

    But I'm saying, in this system, that I arbitrarily made, he starts on a 0, not a 6. I can see why if you think every player starts at a 6, then a 3 would be a diss. But they don't, so it's not. You're more than welcome to do your own list, and use your own system (don't, it's a waste of time, we've literally signed 5000 players).

    Imagine a long line of every Watford player signed by Gino, ranked in order of who has had the greatest impact on the club. Zinckernagel, with his 9 starts (and yes, a couple of assists) sadly isn't very high up that list, for me. And again, that's not a slight on him in any way whatsoever. I think that side still goes up without Zinc in the team, so I can't even have him at the level of Guedioura, for example.

    His contribution at Forest, transfer fee paid and and future transfer fee received have zero impact on his score, which I clarified on the thread.

    I guess the only other way I can clear your last point up is that I also gave 3/10 scores to Layun and Berghuis. Both objectively good players, who I really liked! But their impact, on the pitch, in a Watford shirt, was worthy of a 3/10, imo. Again, not a slight on their ability, or lack thereof.
     
    Burnsy likes this.
  17. Knight GT

    Knight GT Predictor extraordinaire 2013/14

    I know some players are subbed more than others but this does feel like it's every game
     
  18. The undeniable truth

    The undeniable truth First Team Captain

    He does seem to cover the ground though - maybe a pre-agreed plan to run himself stupid for 70 mins ? As others have pointed out, he seems to always be picked next game so it's not as though he played poorly to earn the subbing.
     
  19. LeedsOrn

    LeedsOrn Reservist

    Having watched him several times, very clearly the plan is for him to lead the press very aggressively for 70 mins rather than pace himself across the full 90.
     
    The undeniable truth and RS2 like this.
  20. Happy bunny

    Happy bunny Cheered up a bit

    Really?
     
  21. miked2006

    miked2006 Premiership Prediction League Proprietor

    Yes. I’d be shocked if he wasn’t at a PL club next season. Which is not something I’d say about any of our current midfield.
     
  22. lowerrous

    lowerrous First Team

    Garner is worse than Zinckernagel. It was the case with us last season and it's still the case now at Forest.

    If Forest get promoted and still want to keep Garner as a starting CM and first choice set-piece taker then they will not last very long in the division at all.
     
    Chiswell and lutonh8a like this.
  23. Knight GT

    Knight GT Predictor extraordinaire 2013/14

    If that's the plan then fair enough. Do feel it's strange to have one of your three subs sorted before the game even starts though.
     
  24. Burnsy

    Burnsy First Team

    5 subs at Championship level (and probably PL next season)....
     
  25. Knight GT

    Knight GT Predictor extraordinaire 2013/14

    But not in the season that's just finishing
     
    Burnsy likes this.
  26. CarlosKickaballs

    CarlosKickaballs Forum Picarso

    Looking forward to the toxicity he brings to the dressing room when Pozzi refuse to let him leave to Forest
     
  27. Carpster

    Carpster Squad Player

    Didn't see a great deal from him today. A few flicks and one touch passes but nothing getting overexcited about.
     
  28. Hogg-DEENEY!!!

    Hogg-DEENEY!!! Squad Player

    Congratulations, Zinck, a fine season has the best ending for you and Forest!
     
    cyaninternetdog likes this.
  29. RS2

    RS2 Squad Player

    Would be one of our best players next season.
     
    cyaninternetdog and Burnsy like this.
  30. hornetboy1

    hornetboy1 First Team Captain

    I don’t think Forest would want him. He’s a luxury player, a little lazy and is only at a Championship level. I’d snap their hand off if they put a bid in for him, but I doubt they will.
     
  31. davisp2

    davisp2 Reservist

    I think Zinc would be a bench warmer in the Prem for Forest. That said they will want a bigger squad in the Prem. Can see him going for £3-4m.
     
  32. WatfordTalk

    WatfordTalk First Team

    Would be good business if we could get around £5m for him. Wouldn't mind if he was in the squad though, could be useful next season
     
    Malteser2 likes this.
  33. Carpster

    Carpster Squad Player

    I'm still expecting the Bodo Zinc to turn up but everytime I see him he frustrates me more than anything.
     
    Smudger likes this.
  34. Smudger

    Smudger Messi's Mad Coach Staff Member

    Expect to see Dodo Zinc.
     
  35. LouOrns

    LouOrns First Year Pro

    One thing you can’t criticise Zinckernagel for being is lazy. One of the most hardworking players in the Championship. Only Callum O’Hare pressed more than Zinckernagel this season
     
    PowerJugs, EB Hornet, jackwfc and 5 others like this.

Share This Page