Jeremy Clarkson

Why do you try and sum up every non-football thread with this as a conclusion?

I for one have already said I like him as an entertainer, like his shows and have no real issue with anything he's been accused of in the past. His politics has never occurred to me as something to like or dislike him for given the extent of it seems to be he 'writes' for The Sun and is mates with Cameron. So yet again your crude categorisation fails.

 

Oh yes, call everyone else a liar or biased here or at the BBC but not poor Jezza.

SIT DOWN SHUT UP. SIT DOWN SHUT UP.

 

I made a statement that I think is true, based on what I read. There is a lot of hated for those on the right or non-PC.

I would think that I have far more to go on (in the way of evidence) in that judgement than you have when you state that you think Clarkson is a liar.

 

Clarkson is a proven liar ... and a complete egocentric aerosol, his run in with dozens of Manx residents and the Manx courts told me that yonks ago.

Detestable and he's the only reason I've never liked Top Gear; I might now start watching it.

 

You seem to believe every hating piece in the Daily Mail and give us post after post showing disdain for your perceived targets of the left despite being shown to be false. I think we know who the 'hater' is here.

And here we have it again, the insinuation that you 'know' more than the rest of us, doubtless from the Head of Biscuits. I expect you could tell us, but you'd have to kill us.

 

I think it's crude PR, sorry. It might have upset him, but a 25 minute rant and assault doesn't just come from nowhere. It is being used as an excuse and maybe as an excuse it belongs to people who actually have had a diagnosis.

We already know that the notion his Dr told him it was probably cancer is likely to be false. So why put much emphasis on it? We would laugh it out of court for your average pub fight or petty crime.

 

He said himself that it didn't excuse him for what he did.

How do you "already know" that it was likely to be false?

You are accusing him of possibly one of the worse type of lies people can tell. What evidence do you have? Posters have been fined £20,000 for making lesser accusations.

 

I'm not accusing him of lying. He may well have thought he had cancer. But to tell us all about it is, whatever he says, a plea to improve his public standing.

A Dr is very unlikely to say 'it's cancer' without investigation. Therefore that bit is more about his state of mind rather than a statement of fact.

You need to understand the difference between accusing someone of lying and of them using something cynically. But then you don't get it because you wanted to swallow the whole thing hook, line and sinker.

 

I think this thread has come to a screeching halt.