DAY 1 - Werewolf 2018

Difference of opinion here. What's more suspicious?

A) A few posts from an individual about their character role/ asking pointless questions/ excuses that aren't consistent?
B) No posts at all?

 

Lol what?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Are these pointless questions???

 

Don't feel comfortable voting for Norway until we see a pattern in the messages in another day or two's time when you can more reliably validate them. As I've said already I'm inclined to think Norway is Good and Diamond is unknown until we can start to disseminate posts based on current knowledge and logic.

 

Only based on the fact you turned up pretty damn close to the second message which I personally am assuming is the wolf's.

It's a very tenuous link.

 

Well all I can say , is I think message 2 is our wolf , on that assumption ,then I am the only one that is good (with some sort of evidence), diamond is probably good as well if we are playing the odds! If second message is the seer then wolfs message was a random guess and the odds are with me being good the same as any other !

 

Hmm fair enough.

Logic behind the other two you named? Have they not posted yet?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Daft row no. SLB only posted after we mentioned him.

 

Neither message gives a compelling reason why we ought vote for Norway or Diamond. One of them at least is definitely good. It's possible it's not, but for now I believe the second message is from the wolf. If so it virtually exonerates Diamond as well as Norway. Not that Diamond is showing himself much to be a player for team good so far, but that can be said of others too.

So let's look at quiet posters, especially old players. Squibba is perennialy quiet...sometimes wonder why he signs up to play! Miked...he is playing differently. He has played in every game I have and was always active from memory. Time is running here for me, unless somebody points out something I'm not yet seeing Mike has my vote.

 

Exactly why I think it’s not Daft Row @Meh


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Careful, you were my second choice!!!

 

True, but I never buy into this "I forgot" excuse. I mean, who is that busy they forget? Put it in your diary if you're that forgetful or busy FFS. It only comes around once a bloody year (Apologies to those with genuine reasons!!!)

 

Why would you vote for a player who you think is "probably good"?

 

I agree. Miked maybe quieter than usual but I'd give him another day as may be busy. Benefit of the doubt for miked for today as he is an asset for team good if good.

 

You’re saying somebody who isn’t posting is more likely to be guilty. Squibbs is saying someone who doesn’t post at all is less likely to be guilty, as this arises greater suspicion. I personally think it's more suspicious to be silent, as those players are very likely to be booted on day 1.

A question trying to work out a rationale on which to vote isn't pointless. One saying: 'what time does the tavern open' or a basic gameplay question to the mods by an experienced player is.

 

Because as things stand it’s better than a stab in the dark. I’m saying that it’s a possibility they’re both good but I think Day One is too early to be voting for people based solely on message frequency.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

One myth I always see is that quiet players raise suspicions. They don't. Every single game we have quiet wolves and time and again the named people get whacked while the quiet ones move into the latter part of the game. Let's try something different this time?

 

Pointless train of thought. He/they are also an asset for team bad if that's what they are this game.

 

Hi All. Apologies for being out all morning, been a busy boy. Reading through each page now and will come back...

 

He's bad and we don't we have another chance. He's good and we do he's gone.

I'll play the odds and not vote for him yet.

You're assumptions are only based on theory as much as anyone elses.

 

Hate the first day or two, it's either wasted votes which almost always kill off a Good or vote for inactive players who will get killed by the organiser anyway.

 

It doesn't help much but a Wolf who is actively playing wouldn't post nothing at all as these people always get lynched on Day 1. And if they are a wolf who's forgotten about the game, they'll be eliminated anyway for not posting.

In my mind, a vote for a totally silent player is a wasted vote - it usually takes out an innocent non-player and allows two kills.

 

Until we get more intel ,then i think its a good idea to vote off a no show and save otter the hassle of doing it, at least those bothering to play get an extended run by one day .

 

I agree it's the safest option to, it's just frustrating that you can't go for another option without potentially jeopardizing Good.

 

Conveniently posting as soon as quiet people are showing up on the radar?

 

Voted, sorry Mike, your gameplay is just too different.