An example of the new ‘woke’ I was talking about… “It’s not me that’s changed, it’s the left. It’s now made up of a small contingent that’s gone mental, and a large contingent that won’t call them out for it.” OK, it’s just Bill Maher, but it is a significant bite into the suspended reality that the left have been relying on for the last few years. Bill Maher has woken up.
So, because the Republicans are introducing laws that are less harsh than New York, they are worse than the Democrats because they are merely moving closer? Again, listen to yourself. If you can't see any other Democrat states trying to catch up with New York, it is just as logical to assume that the reason is that they are already there, as it is that they are little angels. If you had read the article, and seen that he sorted out his problem quickly and efficiently with months to go before the primaries, what on earth is the point you are making? What are the hurdles you believe are insurmountable? There is no logic in your argument about a guy who identified and then dealt with the problems in front of him. All he did was prove they are surmountable, bumps in the road and not even hurdles, and the article is making his success into a failure. Absurd. Totally absurd.
Thanks. Have some likes. In good old forum fashion I'm going to chalk it down to 'never going to agree in a million years' and will park it there.
Nog sure about the likes, but always happy if someone wishes to say we will not agee. That is what the forum is for.
In fairness, it's difficult to find common ground with people who just make things up. Hardly your fault.
I give you the modern left. Don't agree with them? Not just smearing himself in s***e, but the whole of the forum, with his disgusting intolerance. And some people like it. And I got suspended for replying to forum posts.
Guys if this "Nazi" talk continues this thread will be closed. Please do not berate each other with such labels. Debate by all means, but please keep the personal insults out of it.
Interesting Louis Theroux documentary last night on the America First movement and its use of social media to facilitate online hate and monetise it. Never quite sure of Theroux, but he always does a job of letting people reveal themselves. Highly unpleasant in this instance, the notions that there is a white genocide. But what the young men clearly demonstrated was their crisis of masculinity.
Fuentes is a dik. He is the unhinged loon that the left use to bad mouth all conservative politics. But it's a bit Like saying Nick Griffin represents conservatism in the UK, and is a key player in the build back better movement. He is as pathetic and unsavoury as he appears, getting views numbering in the low to mid hundreds on his America First (not the movement, but his own use of a common phrase) blogs. He is banned from Republican party events, and is even aggressively at odds with organisations such as Turning Point (about as right wing as the mainstream gets) and CAP, and he uses the America First label, rather than represents it, a bit like how Labour uses the anti racist label, but continues to have issues with anti-Semetism and Islamophobia. Anyone can get a cheer for shouting America first to a patriotic mob, many of whom will be from US minorities. It doesn't mean that the crowd agree with your vile politics though. Mask off, he is the antithesis of the modern right, and is almost universally rejected. So good job, Louis, for exposing a sad loser, but it's just a shame that your programme leaves itself exposed to misrepresenting his place in the world. Label him an extremist loser, stick him on the shelf next to antifa incels (he is the right wing equivalent of a John Sullivan or a generic Talcolm X) and lock the cupboard door.
There's nothing wrong with US Republican politics you libtard cucks: Just asking for a friend - are these new or used?
Better than Socialism (religion) Racism (weapon of choice) Abortion (all the way up to full term) Which would be the Democrat equivalent. No wonder they won't put it on the side of a bus. Just because we brits don't get A2, doesn't mean we should show our ignorance everytime an American defends it. There are plenty of US commies who would very much sympathise with the "Guns" line of her campaign. Which leaves the right as the sole champions of religion and babies.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/national-archives-trump-took-classified-items-to-mar-a-lago LOCK HIM UP, LOCK HIM UP
Another black white supremacist who won’t let whitey tell him what to think. How can he be so deluded? Or perhaps the question is. How can the white (and black) left wing extremists that call him a house n****r or Uncle Tom be so deluded? Are people over here starting to get the message on CRT yet? Is anyone still going to defend it? Is it still racist to call out such ‘black advancement’ when so many of the people who oppose it are from ethnic minorities? Or do middle class white Britons know best, when it comes to what American families should take from their ‘betters’?
Yeah. OK. Not an attempt to distract from the fact that people working for Hilary Clinton are now being charged with spying on Trump's campaign, Trump's private addresses and the Executive Office of the President of the United States. It doesn't make them guilty, yet, but the virtually zero response from legacy media to an actual prosecution that suggests crimes dwarfing Watergate, suggests that people on Hilary's side of politics are less than comfortable with this news. The few counter claims from Democrats and lefties, consist of denials that spying on the President is illegal and standard tropes rolled out whenever those guys are faced with something they can't find an argument against. "It's just what people do on campaigns", well tell that to Nixon, and "Durham is a white supremacist". Then think of this. They spied on Trump when he was President, and they still had to invent the Russia dossier. How clean must Trump have been that they couldn't come up with anything on him. Anyone wonder why they haven't heard about this. Mostly it's because you don't want to, and neither does the media you use.
Oh yeah. Are people aware that BLM are being investigated for failing to report audits on the money they had donated to them? A sixty million dollar Black hole, which some suggest may have something to do with founder member Patrice Colors' multi million dollar house portfolio, many of which are in affluent 'white' areas, presumably because she feels safer amongst whitey. They were instructed to provide the information, but refused to do so, and are now facing court proceedings. It's OK. They're the Good guys, and anyone investigating them must be white supremacists, including the minorities that despise them, including the parents of the dead people BLM used to raise the missing funds, yet made no effort to support the families.
Which ‘people’ have been ‘charged with spying’? Hope you don’t mean Sussmann, who has been charged by Durham with lying to the FBI. Something he denies and so will go on trial in the summer for. Another person, an FBI lawyer, was charged and pleaded guilty to making a false statement on a warrant application. So that’s two people, neither of whom have been charged with spying on Trump. Who are the others? And what media coverage are you expecting right now exactly? Sussman was charged last year. It was big news at the time. It will be big news when the trial starts. But the case is in the doldrums right now, winding it’s way to trial. What was big news for Republicans and righties this week was a mundane filing in the case made by Durham which insinuated some things which he later made another filing to explicitly deny having intended to the insinuate. Even then, when I search Google it appears every major US news outlet covered it. Plus it wasn’t even new - it was all in the original indictment last autumn and reported at the time. Of course, Fox News and Newsmax or whatever have been yabbering on about it for days and haven’t stopped even after Durham walked it back. Why would they do that I wonder?
I literally never come on here and I've only done so because of it being referenced on a Hornet's nest post, but who the fucck is this Henry Hooter fucckwit, and what's he doing on here mindlessly repeating astonishingly stupid right-wing Republican talking points from America with a healthy dose of laughably stupid conspiracy theory thrown in for good measure? This is all very strange.
Welcome to the politics thread. Your thoughtful and measured contributions will be treasured by us all I am sure. I can take being called a fucckwit, especially from someone to whom fucckwit must seems nothing more than a distant aspirational dream.
Sort of like your distant aspirational dream to be able to spell correctly! Weeeeyyyyyyyyyy U S A! U S A! U S A!
Perhaps I am wrong here, in my assumption of what is actually going on. But all I can find on a Durham's retractions appears to be an intention to convey a message, through the wording of the filing, to appease the delicacy of Democrats, who now seem to be getting triggered by partisan language, the like of which they used throughout Trump's campaign and his tenure as president. Again, as always, my sources are black conservatives, who admittedly did refer to Fox. The spying, as I understand it, is beyond question. It is a matter of whether or not the spying was done for legitimate purposes or for the furtherment of the Clinton campaign, or the Democrat party in general. Given that the Muller report and Russiagate were a huge political and media invention, which even Schiff seems to recognises now, perhaps you might consider for a moment that Clinton and the Democrats, along with their media, may actually lieing and spinning to you, again, on this occasion?
As I say. State of the left right now. Why don't you get someone in that will actually make an argument. I am feeling very much on the moral high ground in here right now.
Do you consider your black conservative Fox-citing news sources of choice might be lying and spinning to you? And I can’t see how you can conclude the spying is ‘beyond question’ when Barr’s handpicked special counsel has been on the case for over 2 years looking for the deep state actors behind the plot to spy on and plant evidence against Trump and has collared one low level but certainly naughty FBI lawyer (for a non-spying crime) and lined up a sole non-spying charge against a lawyer with links to the Democrats. Watergate it ain’t.
Yes I do. I consider that with every source. But on the majority of occasions, they appear to be right. Why should you trust the CNN and MSNBC citing Democrats on this or anything else they say after the debacle they recieved on Russiagate, particularly around Trump. Why do you think Biden's popularity has dropped from being the most popular president ever, to figures that now rival Trump?
Oh, I have no intention of countering your assertion that you have 'dislexia', I wouldn't dream of it. I got the information from you, when you told me it. All pretty straight up and down.
Why is it a matter of trust or something requiring others to tell me what 2 people have been charged with? ‘Has someone been charged with or otherwise officially accused by the authorities of spying? *Checks records* No’. Easy. And I didn’t even have to see what Hilary or CNN has to say to reach that stunning conclusion. Not sure why you’re diverting this into Biden. I’ll admit though it’s nice to see a President prepared to let a special counsel get on with his job without constantly attacking him on social media.
Oh don't worry, it'll all come out soon. Rudy Giuliani has boxes of evidence in his bedroom waiting for blonde journalists to come and see.
