Matt Jarvis to Wolves

Discussion in 'The Transfer List' started by krisvad, Jun 20, 2007.

  1. krisvad

    krisvad Forum Viking

  2. Berkohorn

    Berkohorn Reservist

    I don't think we missed out - we didn't want him. On the few times that I have seen him he didn't impress me.

    I would much rather have Smiith, Mcanuff and Hameur everytime - no contest imo.
     
  3. orn2000

    orn2000 Reservist

    Same i would not have wanted him when we have capable wingers allready. Much prefer that we actually got a new striker. Wolves obviously wanted him because they missed out on Mcanuff.
     
  4. PotGuy

    PotGuy Forum Fetishist

    He was pretty average.

    Coudl have done a job but Jobi SHOULD be better.
     
  5. UEA_Hornet

    UEA_Hornet First Team Captain

    Agreed. Obviously Wolves signed him as we got Jobi first.
     
  6. kingjames77

    kingjames77 Squad Player

    Aidy even admitted he'd been watching Jarvis.... im content that betty didnt see anything too special.. reading what their chairmans had to say about it all, it seems Mattys agents been desparate to get him a move for over a year now.

    Sounds more and mroe as though that guys been built up into something he's obviously not.
     
  7. Aberystwyth_Hornet

    Aberystwyth_Hornet Squad Player

    Jobi is proven at this level (even if he did have an injury prone season last year) so i feel we have signed the better of the two...and it was unlikely we'd sign both (unless Bouazza was leaving which i don't think will happen)
     
  8. kingjames77

    kingjames77 Squad Player

    There are people out there (his agent for one) who are adamant that Boozers on his way..... he'd be a massive loss for us if he did go!
     
  9. krisvad

    krisvad Forum Viking

    WE'd be well and truly farked if Boozer left. He's a big threat and we would not be abvle to find a replacement nomatter how much money we were paid for him.
     

Share This Page