Anonimity Stinks (In This Case Anyway !)

Discussion in 'Taylor's Tittle-Tattle - General Banter' started by Budfrog, Nov 21, 2008.

  1. Budfrog

    Budfrog Reservist

  2. wfcwarehouse

    wfcwarehouse First Team Captain

    They're scum. I hope they rot in hell.
     
  3. wfcmoog

    wfcmoog Tinpot

    Who is the law supposed to be protecting?
     
  4. davidnewtonwfc

    davidnewtonwfc Reservist

  5. The Hornet

    The Hornet The Quiet Mod is Watching

    Her name is all over Facebook!
     
  6. Timbers

    Timbers Apeman

    http://www.dailysquib.co.uk/ has basically name them then? I always thought it was a sort of made up website?

    So the BBC posted the names of the parents a year ago when the story first broke (see davidnewtonwfc) but have had to delete it. Why has it taken this long for it to make the national news?

    Why are they being protected?
     
  7. UEA_Hornet

    UEA_Hornet First Team Captain

    There are loads of potential reasons and none of them are for their own benefit. The one that jumps immediately to mind is that there's another case currently winging it's way through the legal system which is linked in some way and the release of these names would be prejudicial to it. Or maybe it's to protect the identity of the child.
     
  8. Timbers

    Timbers Apeman

    Or is it just that they will/would be murdered in prison when on remand and that would not look good in govermental circles?
     
  9. UEA_Hornet

    UEA_Hornet First Team Captain

    Hardly. Sick as this particular trio are, we've seen worse in our prison system who have been identified and are still living to tell the tale. A certain sicko from Soham comes to mind.
     
  10. Fozzie

    Fozzie Reservist

    This just shows how twisted the law in this country is.

    Protect the criminal, sod the victim...

    I hope they suffer in prison.
     
  11. davidnewtonwfc

    davidnewtonwfc Reservist

    The name of the child has been released too, it's whatever it is..

    It's also believed they are being kept in confinement in prison to avoid any inmates gutting them. Which goes back to Moogs point of who is the law protecting?

    I can understand the point of the current case deciding future case law though.
     
  12. UEA_Hornet

    UEA_Hornet First Team Captain

    Not legally it hasn't.

    "A court order, which remains in place, prevented the publication of the identities of the baby's mother and her boyfriend, as well as the child." - BBC News, 1710hrs

    And so what if they are being kept in confinement? Standard practice for their types.
     
  13. Fozzie

    Fozzie Reservist

    It could be wise to not post their names on here.

    Anyone who wants to find out the identities of these vile animals or the victim can easily do so using a search engine.
     
  14. UEA_Hornet

    UEA_Hornet First Team Captain

    A good spot there Fozzie. Removed.

    Discuss away folks, there's a decent debate to be had here, but keep the names from being posted on here. Ta!
     
  15. fan

    fan slow toaster

    i'm almost certain thats a the reason. and you just know a bunch of people would be proper pissed if there was a mistrial because everyone wanted confirmation of what they already knew
     
  16. davidnewtonwfc

    davidnewtonwfc Reservist

    Sorry :-[
     
  17. UEA_Hornet

    UEA_Hornet First Team Captain

    Well it's not like anyone who did want to take a pop at them in prison wouldn't know already....

    Haha don't worry Dave!
     

Share This Page