Werewolf XVI: Day 7

Discussion in 'Old Games' started by 352, Jun 9, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. wfcSinatra

    wfcSinatra Predictor Choker 14/15

    I am actually just sh*t at this game hence my rubbish votes.

    *Didn't realise there was an above message just saw my name in the 2nd and replied

    Two man shoot-out between me and WAS then.

    If I do get lynched I have to say something about WatfordTalk stands out, always posts on Watford FC matters but quiet in here. Keep an eye out!
     
  2. nairobi hornet

    nairobi hornet Reservist

    True, could be a clever wolf, if someone presents a better argument I'm all for hearing it
     
  3. nairobi hornet

    nairobi hornet Reservist

    We already have the second message
     
  4. wfcSinatra

    wfcSinatra Predictor Choker 14/15

    I technically meant first message as I thought the one naming me was first because I didn't scroll up any further sorry guys!
     
  5. wfcmatt

    wfcmatt First Year Pro

    Well the great news is that unless the seer was unfortunate enough to view a tinker, we will get rid of a wolf today or tomorrow. At the same time it is crucial that we get the correct one today as it would mean one less wolf kill tonight and we can then focus on getting the last wolf tomorrow.

    As it stands, I still believe that my theory yesterday was correct in that the first message yesterday was from the seer, I still can't see for the life of me why a wolf would've posted a 'good' message first. Following that logic I'm leaning towards believing the second message today since that is clearly from the same person, and as such right now my vote will be for Squibba. But of course I'd like to hear the defence from both WAS and Squibba before voting.
     
  6. nornironhorn

    nornironhorn Administrator Staff Member

    We have both messages

    EDIT: IGNORE AS DIDN'T SEE OTHER COMMENTS ON PAGE 2
     
  7. WatfordTalk

    WatfordTalk First Team

    Was it confirmed that we have no tinkers/traitors left?

    Gotta be a lynch for WAS today, I'm afraid.
     
  8. HappyHornet24

    HappyHornet24 Crapster Staff Member

    Trouble is, unless either Squibba or WAS is a 'special role', what either of them has done in the past is somewhat irrelevant since one of them could be the 'new' wolf.
     
  9. wfcmatt

    wfcmatt First Year Pro

    Oh wow. More feigning ignorance and pretending that you're rubbish perhaps? When really you know it was you yourself who sent the first message as the wolf about 2 hours ago now?- but of course not because you're so silly that you don't even know the order the messages were posted?
     
  10. wfcSinatra

    wfcSinatra Predictor Choker 14/15

    I can't see the poll results now but read that 2 out of the 4 who voted for WAS died. So one would be Phillipine who was a very experienced and clever player, if he went for WAS I'm inclined to trust him.

    I'm just an ordinary villager though not a Mason so if you do lynch me it won't be a HUGE loss to the village (but I'd like to stay alive because its fun:jumping1:)
     
  11. nairobi hornet

    nairobi hornet Reservist

    To be fair this makes sense too, damn it I really am 50/50 today
     
  12. steve harrow

    steve harrow Reservist

    There can't be a traitor because evil was down to 1 and the wolf was active overnight.

    Unknown if the second tinker is alive or not. Remember that any simple villager can be a tinker and not know it.
     
  13. WatfordTalk

    WatfordTalk First Team

    I'm not great at the theory side of this game, so I've been thinking of some way I can contribute.

    So we can be sure we now have 2 wolves, 1 seer, 1 Guardian, ??? masons, 0 tinkers, 0 traitors? Any special characters I'm missing?

    We know WAS, norn and merchandiseman can't be the Guardian.

    We know nairobi can't be a wolf(?)



    Not sure what that tells anyone, just thought I'd put some of that out there.
     
  14. wfcSinatra

    wfcSinatra Predictor Choker 14/15

    No lol?

    I click the two little arrows to open a thread because that starts you at the bottom with the most current post, scrolled up and saw my name, was intrigued and started to reply, not that deep.

    Didn't you suggest keeping WAS yesterday so in turn you saw the killing of a good HarrowOrn? Also WAS heavily supported your 'great' theory too if I'm correct
     
  15. steve harrow

    steve harrow Reservist

    Yes and no. The alpha wolf has been here from day 1 so there may be evidence of evil doing but you're right that it won't prove anyone as good.
     
  16. nairobi hornet

    nairobi hornet Reservist

    3 of the 4 who voted for was died as Harrow voted as well, potentially all three were masons as they voted the same people for all but one day
     
  17. With A Smile

    With A Smile First Team

    Squibba you crafty git. all this "i've played the game badly" rubbish.


    HH24 - No, no special roles

    I haven't looked at Squibba voting or anything like that yet, but i'm sure we will.

    I was expecting the wolf to name me as evil, it would have made sense after I was named as good yesterday. Wasn't this the same pattern earlier in the game ? Someone would be named as good, next or same day then as evil. It's been a fairly consistent trait.

    Where we know the seer has changed, that tac -tic might well have changed, where we think we have had the same wolf, that tac-tic has remained the same
     
  18. HappyHornet24

    HappyHornet24 Crapster Staff Member

    True. We can still try to find clues for the 'alpha' wolf but, yes, I meant more that all bets are off re proven 'goodies'.
     
  19. steve harrow

    steve harrow Reservist

    There may be a tinker. 0 or 1.

    The guardian may have looked after themselves so I don't think anything can be read into that other than a good role (guardian) thought them also good at that point in time.

    Nairobi can't be the alpha wolf but could be the new wolf.
     
  20. nornironhorn

    nornironhorn Administrator Staff Member

    Good point, we may have a tinker still.

    Obviously I can't be sure, but Squibba is one of the few people who have accused me of being suspicious (he has done it more than once) and the guardian protected me one night so I'd say Squibba is also not the Guardian
     
  21. wfcSinatra

    wfcSinatra Predictor Choker 14/15

    I'm not the Guardian or a mason or a wolf. I'm a villager.
     
  22. wfcmatt

    wfcmatt First Year Pro

    Just doing a little what some players like to call 'fishing'. Not really my style but I was interested in how you'd react. I'm willing to hear you out but you'll have to convince me with logic- why can you not possibly not be the wolf (and not just 'oh I'm rubbish at this game!') And where is the hole in my theory from yesterday?
     
  23. wfcSinatra

    wfcSinatra Predictor Choker 14/15

    I don't know why I can't not possibly be the wolf to be fair, my voting so far has been awful I've been wrong every time so I do look suspicious but it's important to note I haven't tried to majorly sway any votes so far because I haven't been sure once, I've followed instinct that's all.

    And I haven't looked again at what it was but didn't you want to protect WAS? I don't think you're evil just that it was something to note.
     
  24. wfcmatt

    wfcmatt First Year Pro

    Another reason I'm convinced the first message today is the wolf- when the second message yesterday said they would view WAS today, I thought to myself if that is the wolf they'll obviously come out and say WAS is evil in their message. I was proven correct and it's such as obvious tactic.
     
  25. With A Smile

    With A Smile First Team

    Squibba there are three of us that know the truth, you, me and the seer
     
  26. wfcSinatra

    wfcSinatra Predictor Choker 14/15

    I even missed the vote between Moog & Harrow (on Friday I think?) and admitted even after it was proved Moog was evil that I would've voted Harrow because I wanted to be completely honest. If I was the wolf I would've said Moog and basked in the glory of his lynching.
     
  27. With A Smile

    With A Smile First Team

    There is something else to back that up as well

    The seer yesterday refereed to WAS
    The seer today refereed to WAS when they reiterate the point that i was viewed as good yesterday
    The wolf today refers to With A Smile
     
  28. wfcmatt

    wfcmatt First Year Pro

    Perhaps, I'll keep that in mind but you could always be the new wolf. But WAS's defence is based on the fact I believe the second message today is from the seer and as such is more likely reasoning imo
     
  29. wfcSinatra

    wfcSinatra Predictor Choker 14/15

    Your Twitter name is MattPSP

    Are you wfcmatt too? :naughty::naughty:
     
  30. nornironhorn

    nornironhorn Administrator Staff Member

    Could be something in this, wonder who has used that in their comments in the past few days
     
  31. wfcmatt

    wfcmatt First Year Pro

    Haha. With a Smile is my happy alter ego
     
  32. With A Smile

    With A Smile First Team

    I've been throwing mud all game hoping some sticks, fishing, naming suspicious people to try to get a reaction. I've drawn attention to myself all the way through, voted erratically and not with the crowd but given a reason to why.

    Yes I got Harrow wrong and i'll admit that i thought it was strange that so many wanted to vote for Moog having not been mentioned in any message.

    I do think it was an obvious tac-tic by the wolf to name me today and a tac-tic they have used all game
     
  33. With A Smile

    With A Smile First Team

    SSShhhhhhh

    or in your case


    GGGGGrrrrrrrrrrooooowwwWWWLLLLLLL
     
  34. HappyHornet24

    HappyHornet24 Crapster Staff Member

    But we have no proof yet of which message was from the seer or wolf yesterday.
     
  35. With A Smile

    With A Smile First Team

    The wolfs tac tic all game has to be to follow up someone being named as good to name them as evil the same or next day

    Thats how they have managed to keep the suspect list so tight
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page