Yes but even so, there must be the chance that a club will try out a few of their youngsters early on, take a view that loaning out is best and then find that the loan doesn't work out and then want to change things in Jan. A 3 club limit would make more sense. If Muff loaned him out without a break clause then it's our issue rather than theirs, at least financially, though it was odd they played him knowing he was about to join us...
Unless there is a character/ attitude issue, it makes no sense to send him back if it saves us no money. But he has to be 3rd/4th choice forward meaning we get someone else in this month to rotate with Bayo and Doumbia has a chance over him again.
Congratulations sent to the opposition upon beating the team you currently play for is quite enough to suggest he isn’t the brightest tool in the box!
Does that mean as it’s a different league he can run around the pitch for a third club in the same season then?
There may be a god…: evanilson and unal both out for the season. They may actually need him to go back
Surely they won't think he's good enough to play for them in the prem ? Much more likely they will sign another striker.
Be a sub at best but you know he will come on and get a winner v someone big . Cue meltdown on X etc .
Awful, awful player. Delighted to see him gone. "He can't be as bad as Bayo/Rajovic" - aaannnnnnnnnnnddddddddddd he really was.
We managed to have four good strikers at once under Jokanovic. All we're asking for is one. Do not disappoint me.
Waste of a loan . Hardly played and didn’t impress when he was picked . You just know he’ll score for Bournemouth though .
Bournemouth making sure he plays no part in tomorrow’s game so he won’t be cup-tied. A striker’s game is hugely based on confidence and it’s clear he had none. 100% the right decision for all involved
