Global Werewolf - Day 3

No, I won't answer your questions, because you are my current no. 1 suspect, so unless something between now and 6pm radically changes my mind, I will be voting for you.

 

In trouble now Istanbul. Nairobi is Mayor too.

Stinks of corruption with his unwillingness to make a case for himself and his petulant attitude.

 

FO

 

Nairobi's second vote for Istanbul has been added

 

Just making the most of it before one of you kill me off overnight.

 

Kenya and Czech Republic on the brink of war.

 

I've voted. This has been a very unproductive day in the village.

Certain cities have spent the day forming pet theories around zero evidence, asking questions which have already been answered, which have no bearing on the outcome and sowing utter confusion. It's been a very good day for Team Evil, to come off the back of the wolf's message being exposed, but to have this much noise and nonsense spouted has led to a complex web of misdirection.

I am pretty confident that our 3 evil players are amongst the following:

Istanbul
Elche
Tokyo
Jeddah

 

The longer it goes on, the better our chances of winning. We're all about stamina.

 

Have you? I may have missed it, so happy for you to resend. If you feel I've misquoted you, please also provide fuller quotes/ context etc too. The more information we have, the better.

As an overall point. In this game, players don't need to say "X is acting like an evil player" to cast doubt. In fact, it is probably unwise to. Asking a question which encourages further speculation is just as suspicious.

 

Where have you been all day?

 

It is in the interests of all good villagers to act openly, truthfully and always try and answers suspicions with rational analysis.

You refusing to answer my question and then voting for me with virtually no explanation is not the typical behavioural profile of a good villager.

 

Once again, you quoted a post of mine and then your first words 'Have you?' show you have failed either to comprehend the words, or you have misinterpreted them again.

 

It was a pointless question.

 

I was going to vote for Nairobi anyway, so FYI Im voting for him because of reasons I have stated throughout day not as a retaliation for him voting against me as that would not be beneficial to Team good.

I have to leave at 5.15, hopefully Ill still be alive when I get back.

 

The reasons you stated, like a stuck record were that I thought that really, really badly quoted line from Henry V was too far from the actual text to be Henry V. That is some compelling evidence right there.

 

No question is pointless in this process. You have increased the level of suspicion around you by evading the question.

Your message style is of somebody who has a 'role'. But your arrogant tone and antagonistic approach is not the behaviour of a seer, whos job is to guide and steer. We already know who all the masons are, so that only leaves an evil role.

I expect to be eaten by wolf tonight , if so then we will know I am on the right track.

 

Sorry, I meant "Have I". It's a shame that a typo has detracted away from the overall point of the post however.

 

Think I’ve seen enough today.

Planning on going for a run after work so will probably vote earlier so as not to miss the deadline (need to make sure I’m able to keep pace with the Kenyans somehow).

Well aware that if it’s wrong I’ll likely be spectating from the cemetery tomorrow, but willing to risk it based on the info we have so far thanks to the (probable) seer’s message earlier.

 

Well, you have deliberately been nebulous and have obfuscated throughout, so it fits the pattern. My words, which you have now quoted twice, clearly show that I was indicating other people had pointed the finger at Oslo. I was asking them for their reasons. I then went on to clarify that, which you even quoted. You then deliberately misrepresented that in your own summation of the quote.

 

As Nairobi seems to be in trouble anyway, I will say one thing and I'm probably super wrong.

However, I did at one point think Nairobi was our Guardian as he was the first person protected by The Guardian and I cannot for the life of me work out why our Guardian protected him? So went on the assumption that with limited evidence, Nairobi decided to protect himself on Day 1.

 

The old "I expect I'll get eaten tonight gambit." Prague beat you to it.

 

It’s a personal fave.

 

I'm not the guardian. If you look back, however, you will see that Prague has been after me for some reason since yesterday. Even hinted at it on day one. I suspect they have been looking for evidence to fit their theory, rather than forming a theory based on evidence.

Istanbul, suggests I'm the wolf for the reason that I won't answer their questions about Henry V, which were self evident in the original post they are buzzing on about anyway.

Both meaningless accusations. Both misguided.

Other people have been showing better insight, with fewer repetitive posts.

 

Well, if I survive tonight's vote, I suspect I'll get eaten tonight......

 

As above. I feel that asking a question which indirectly encourages people to speculate about a player (who was likely the Mason) makes you suspicious. Even though I completely accept that you didn't directly accuse Oslo.

If I asked: "So people seem to think Nairobi is acting suspiciously. In what ways is he doing so?" I wouldn't be surprised if you accused me of building consensus against you.

If I was trying to misdirect, I wouldn't have left your explanation in the message. I personally didn't believe it, but this game does make you cynical.

 

Sorry, but if you think I have no right to be even the slightest bit suspicious of you when you have been mentioned in a message which it looks like we can assume was from the Alpha Wolf, then that’s up to you.

I’ll eat my words happily if I’m wrong, but that’s my theory so far.

 

3 people (in a row, from memory) had mentioned Oslo. It made sense to ask them why.

 

You've not been "the slightest bit suspicious" though. You've been obsessive to the point of ignoring every other player,

 

It’s been an absolute shambles of a day, with you as much a party to the confusion as anyone, and yet I’m in your wonky sights? Bizarre stuff.

 

Not at all true.

More than happy to observe the three masons, and all the finger pointing for people allegedly not posting enough or just saying hello. You’ve just not done anything to convince me that I shouldn’t have you on my radar. And for my reasons above, that is why you have my vote.

Simples.

 

Was it Santiago who was late voting yesterday , would make sense Globe would grant an extension for a major role player , I dont think he is the Seer

 

Rationale for each would be helpful!

 

I must be in the minority. I think we've learned quite a lot from today:

1. We know that the second messenger day 1, 2 and (very likely 3) was the seer. This cleared Krakow, Denver and almost certainly Venice. On day 1, the Alpha would have known that Krakow was good, and very likely voted to lynch him. The traitor is likely to have done the same.

2. We know that the Alpha very likely wanted us to go for Oslo today. Given Oslo is very likely a Mason, we can look at who was trying to get us to lynch him, who didn't accept he was a Mason and who had given weight to the first message, to try to find evil players.

As werewolf goes, given the seer likely hasn't found an evil player yet, I'd define that as progress.

 

Jeddah who is in your sights ?