Why did we play 4-5-1, when we should of stuck to our 4-4-2 formation, we had 2 strikers, and would of given priskin confidence by playing him.
It seems odd to play 1 up front when playing long ball (i mean direct). It means that the midfield has to get up to support him, which they weren't doing all that well.
Agree, playing 4-5-1 is what you do when you play away games, so why do it at home, surely it would of made sense to go 4-4-2 from the start and attack and then if need to make changes then go to 4-5-1
We have no reason to play 4-5-1 as we don't use the midfield anyway - it was a stupid decision to play it, and I think AB knew that by half time but the players just didn't seem to kick on in the 2nd half
